Anishinawbe Blog

November 23, 2009

Why First Nations Shouldn’t Pay HST

Last week, the Government of Ontario introduced legislation entrenching the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST) in Ontario beginning July 1, 2010.  There is a lot of mixed reviews, both for and against the HST.  There is no question, the one thing that the HST is sure to do, is continue the trend that Ontario is one of the most taxed jurisdictions in all of North America.

On most purchases, most people won’t know the difference.  Instead of seeing 8 per cent provincial Retail Sales Tax (RST or PST) and 5 per cent Goods and Services Tax (GST), consumers will see a flat 13 per cent HST on their receipts.

However, the population that will be most adversely affected and will see the most change will be First Nation people.

For the first time since the introduction of the provincial sales tax, First Nations people living on-reserve will be subject to the 8 per cent portion of the tax.  We will have to pay the entire brunt of the 13 per cent sales tax.

Since time immemorial… well, at least my time immemorial, I’ve been able to go into Walmart or The Source, or any other retailer for that matter, present my status card and receive a point-of-sale tax exemption of 8 percent.  In doing so I’d have to endure my share of customer service ignorance, fill out a monstrosity of forms and put up with verbal jibes from the rednecks standing in line behind me.  The more noise they make, the slower I fill out the form.  In one case, after a couple of comments, I reverted to filling out the exemption form left-handed.

If the retailer tried to mess with my right, I would either get an individual fired or go corporate on their ass.

In the end, I felt that the point-of-sale tax exemption was my right.  The contemporary Anishinaabe teaching is that we are supposed to exercise our rights or one day we may lose them.  Apparently that day has come.

But I have a bombshell for many of you.  And it may be difficult for me to say.  But here goes… 

First Nations do NOT have the Treaty right to tax exemption.

There, I said it.  It makes me shudder but it’s entirely true.  The majority of our Treaties, certainly the 1850 Robinson Huron Treaty, does not make reference to taxation.  There are no references or right to tax exemption in most of the Treaties.  It’s a basic fact.

But the treaties said nothing of being subject to paying taxes either.

First Nations must assert that First Nations have the aboriginal right and the sovereign inherent right to be immune from foreign taxation.  Such a right is not only fundamental, it may be protected under international law.  For example:  the United States cannot enter sovereign Canadian territory and force Canadians to pay US taxes.

I think First Nations have a strong case in stating that Canada cannot assert unproven jurisdiction in First Nations’ traditional territory and force First Nations to pay Canadian taxes.

But paying the eight percent is no big deal, we can get it back at the end of the year, right?

Not exactly.  That’s what I thought.  That’s what First Nations leaders thought too.  That’s what a lot of people thought.

My latest research indicates that First Nation individuals are unable to claim a rebate for any purchases off-reserve unless it is delivered to reserve by the retailer’s official agent.

According to the HST/GST Information Update (B-039R3), “… If the purchaser uses his or her own vehicle to transport the property to the reserve, the acquisition is subject to the normal GST/HST rules.”

To their credit, the Government of Ontario is going to bat for First Nations on this issue.  The Minister of Finance and the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs have asked the Government of Canada to respect and continue the current practice of administering the point-of-sale exemption for First Nations.

However, that’s the whole issue: administration of the HST.

Ontario does not have a say in the administration of the tax.  Canada is holding all the cards on point-of-sale exemptions.  Ontario may request a certain point-of-sale exemption, but it’s Canada that has to agree to it.  Unfortunately, the issue of First Nation tax exemption is not a deal breaker for either party.

The biggest argument against First Nations paying the HST should be a socio-economic argument.

First Nations are the poorest of all Canadians.  The socio-economic gap between First Nations and the rest of Canada is staggering.  In Ontario, the unemployment rate for First Nation living on-reserve is at least 3 times higher than the rest of Ontario.  The average income in Ontario is over one third higher than the average income of First Nations people.  One in four First Nations children living on-reserve are growing up in poverty.

Now these same poor people are being asked to pay more and live on less.

Right now, those same red necks in shopping lines everywhere, are praising the changes.  They cite equality and fairness.  “Finally, those Indians are having to pay tax.  What’s fair is fair.”

I’m all for equality and fairness, but that’s a few generations away.  So let’s start with the concept of equity.

What will it take to equalize the unemployment gap?  What will it take to equalize the income gap?  What will it take to bring First Nations children out of poverty?

Forcing the poorest people to pay an additional 8 per cent won’t do it.

November 17, 2009

Friendship Centres Are An Important Gathering Place

Today, several of my friends from the National Association of Friendship Centres (NAFC) are visiting Parliament Hill today to talk to MPs about Friendship Centre programming.

In my opinion, Friendship Centres the most important gathering place and point of service for First Nations people living urban centres right across the country.

The North Bay Indian Friendship Centre is central to the urban First Nation community in the city of North Bay.  Over the years, I’ve also spent time in the N’swakamok Friendship Centre in Sudbury, Parry Sound Native Friendship Centre, Odawa Native Friendship Centre in Ottawa and the Georgian Bay Native Friendship Centre in Midland.

In the 90s, my partner Deborah ran the largest Friendship Centre in Canada, the Native Canadian Centre of Toronto.  I’ve also been a guest at the Council Fire Native Friendship Centre also in Toronto.

Today, there are 115 Friendship Centres in communities right across Canada.

The Friendship Centre movement began in the 1950s, when more and more aboriginal people began to live in cities.  Each Friendship Centre has its own unique history with their own cast of characters, founding members, programs and many, many stories.  By the late 1960s, a growing number of agencies formed provincial and territorial associations.  The National Association of Friendship Centres was founded in 1972.

As a boy, I spent a lot of good times at the North Bay Indian Friendship Centre.

My best memories were always the drum socials and mini pow-wows.  I was always amazed how many people could jam into that little building on Cassells Street.

Folks like Dan Commanda and Peter Beaucage honed their skills in the North Bay Indian Friendship Centre, teaching pow-wow singing, dancing and regalia-making.  They became integral to cultural development in Nipissing in 1980s.  If it weren’t for the cultural programming at the Friendship Centre – there would be little to no cultural development and retention in my community.

I have a lot of great memories singing with Kirby Mianskum and his family.  For me, the Otterhead Singers was the best drum going.  That beat up old drum always sounded good.  I had a chance to sing with Chris Couchie, Gilbert Cheechoo, the Late Archie Cheechoo, Jimmy Dick and others.  Later on, I had the chance to sing with Kirby’s brother Lester Mianskum and the Medicine Hoop Singers.

At the Friendship Centre, I also had a chance to learn from guys like my uncles Jack Couchie and Larry McLeod, Ruth Couchie, Bill Butler and Barney Batisse – people I would later work alongside as an adult.

I also remember the soup.  I remember one time I brought my Mom for lunch one day.  I think she was mortified and thought I was taking her for lunch at the soup kitchen.  I was a big spender.

But the Friendship Centre was more than just a soup kitchen, craft shop and bingo hall.  It was far more than just inadequate office space.  (Remember the old house next door, the steep rickety stairs tot eh second floor offices?)  The Friendship Centre was a gathering place.

I remember how the drop-in centre was a gathering place.  Somewhere, where the Ojibway youth would integrate with the Cree youth and where everyone can feel welcome.

This was our neighbourhood.

I’m sure we made a fortune for the Tim Horton’s owners next door.  We continually frustrated Music City as there were a lot more browsers than buyers of their top-of-the-line guitars.  We ate as much Chinese food as we did fry bread and soup.  And the florists next door wouldn’t miss an opportunity to call the tow truck on those who parked on their side of the line.

All these good memories and I didn’t even live in the city!  I live on the rez and made special trips into North Bay to hang with the Friendship Centre crowd.  I’d spend the night at my brother Andrew’s house and walk into town or take the city bus, the Pinewood route as I recall.

Friendship Centres are the most important service agency for aboriginal people in urban centres.  They play a valuable role in finding employment, access to government services, building individual and family capacity, providing health programs, youth programs and cultural programs.

They directly serve the most vulnerable aboriginal people including the homeless, those living on the streets, youth at risk to drugs and gangs, individuals dealing with addictions, single parents and aboriginal women.

But there is still a lot to be done for First Nations people living in urban centres across Canada.

Friendship Centres can do a lot more with increased and more sustainable funding.  It’s a fact that Friendship Centres across Canada have not seen a funding increase since 1996.

With sustainable funding, Friendship Centres can continue to provide necessary services for aboriginal people who live in the city.  They can continue to be the gathering place that’s so important to a community.  They can continue to provide lasting and formative memories for many other people living or just visiting the city.

November 16, 2009

Rogue Warriors Live Up To Stereotype

Smoke engulfs a minivan as it is overturned during 2006 land-claim protests near disputed Caledonia, Ont., site. Neil Dring Photo/Grand River Sachem 

 “Whoa!  Gee, those nadways sure get violent, i’nit?”  “Oh yeah.  Those warriors sure mean business, cuz.”

Yes, even their fellow indigenous people think the Haudenosaunee play the occupation and resistance card a little too aggressively.

They came out, guns blazing, during the conflict at Kanesatake, the biggest indigenous flashpoint in the last 30 years.  During the Oka Crisis of 1990, the Mohawk Warrior Society took up arms against police and the Canadian Forces.  In 2006, they began occupation and control over a tract of residential development land in Caledonia.  In 2007, they blocked Canada’s biggest freeway and passenger railway corridor during First Nations’ national day of action.

“They” are members of the Mohawk warrior society.  They represent indigenous militancy in the 21 century.  They have gotten far more headlines in recent years than the American Indian Movement, who immortalized indigenous resistance in the 1970s.

Unfortunately, for First Nations advocates and even the non-violent indigenous resistance, the Mohawk warrior society is a lasting example of militant truism and living up to contemporary stereotypes.  First Nations activists do wave scary flags, wear masks, fatigues and balaclavas in the nice weather.  We set things on fire.  We beat up people.  We are lawless terrorists.

I strongly object your honour!  We shouldn’t be painted with the same camouflage brush.

This week, a couple from Caledonia is taking the Ontario Provincial Police to court over damages they have incurred as a result of the alleged inaction of the police during the occupation of the Douglas Creek Estates development in 2006.  Through the evidence and testimony in court, we are seeing many examples of First Nations-led violence.

By all accounts it was a war zone.  Cars were overturned.  Property was burned.  Citizens and police were brutally assaulted.  A hydro sub-station was destroyed.

It’s hard to say that First Nations activists are not terrorists, when quite clearly, that’s exactly what the organizers wanted to get across.

Or was it?

As far as I know, violence was never condoned by the traditional Haudenosaunee confederacy.  Sure, they are tough negotiators, tacticians and they too, mean business – but the Chiefs and Clan Mothers did not mean to hurt others.

The trouble began when the OPP went in and made arrests.  There were some skirmishes but the first wave of protesters retreated.  But through the wonders of technology, more than a few protesters made urgent phone calls to friends and family.  Within an hour, reinforcements from Six Nations arrived and they weren’t too happy.  They were ready to kick ass.

Violence erupted and the OPP where overwhelmed.  The OPP retreated.

I think the OPP made the right decision.  If they pressed the matter, my guess is that an all-out civil war could have taken place.  Guns would have been brought in, and we’d have Kanesatake all over again.

I would hasten to argue, that the lawlessness and violence brought about during the Caledonia occupation was instigated by hooligans from the Six Nations community and elsewhere.  There was a significant lack of discipline within the ranks of the organizers and the warrior society in not dealing with these rogue warriors.  Believe me, the leadership did not have any control over the Caledonia occupation during this time.

It is these rogue warriors that live up to the violent stereotype.

But why would something get so out of hand?  Why do the Haudenosaunee resist so aggressively?

We have to walk a mile in their moccasins, or whatever footwear the Haudenosaunee use.

The Haudenasaunee are also know as the six nations of the Iroquois confederacy.  The six nations are the Mohawk, Oneida, Seneca, Onondaga, Cayuga and the Tuscarora.

Traditionally and in their history, they are a powerful warrior society.  So powerful and strong, that they made war upon their neighbours with great vigour, ruthlessness and lust for victory.  They nearly destroyed my people, the Nipissing, during the 1700s.

However, at one time in their history, this strength and vigour was turned into itself and civil war waged amongst each other.  Through their Great Peace, they literally “buried the hatchet” under the Great Tree of Peace.  This led to a new era of unity and harmony and formed the basis of their Haudenosaunee Confederacy which is still in place today.

Part of their traditional territory in Ontario is known as the Haldimand Tract, which runs 6 miles on each side of the Grand River from its source to Lake Erie.  Over the years, this land was systematically appropriated by the Crown, in contravention to the Haldimand Proclamation of 1794.  Douglas Creek Estates was the last straw in a dispute running over a hundred years.

The Haudenasaunee were the last holdouts against colonial government.  In 1924, the Six Nations hereditary council was removed, by gunpoint, and the community was forced to adhere to the Indian Act.  To their credit, they have always opposed assimilation aggressively and have never agreed to be subject to Her Majesty’s laws.  In fact, the traditional government in Six Nations remains intact.

None of this justifies terrorism and violence against persons and property.  The Haudenosaunee and the Mohawk Warrior Society have a responsibility to clean up their act, or more people will be hurt the next time tempers flare.  But the Haudenosaunee have the right to stand up aggressively against their oppressor.

Where were the police to protect the Six Nations community in 1924 when the Council was threatened at gunpoint?

They were holding the guns.

November 14, 2009

Missing and Murdered First Nation Women are Calling

Left:  Shannon Alexander, 17 went missing with her friend Maisy Odjick, 16 on September 5, 2008 from Kitigan Zibi, Quebec.  Right:  Hilary Bonnell, 16 who went missing on September 5, 2009 from Burnt Church, New Brunswick.  Her body was discovered today.  All three girls were taken on my daughter’s birthday, September 5.

I’m declaring a state of emergency. This is a call to action. Something needs to be done, in a big way, to protect aboriginal women from violence, abduction and murder.

Today, police in New Brunswick announced they have discovered the remains of a young woman who they think is 16 year-old Hilary Bonnell, a Mi’kmaq from the Esgenoopetitj First Nation.  She was last seen on the highway coming from her community of Burnt Church.

“She was so excited because I was going to give her my car,” said Pamela Fillier to the Telegraph-Journal.  Pamela is Hilary’s mom.

“She was so excited to drive it. Now she is never going to get to drive it, she is never going to fall in love, she is never going to get to graduate, she is never going to get married and she is never going to give me grandchildren. I will never get to hold my baby girl again.”

I hadn’t realized the connection to me, until I compared Hillary with two Anishinaabe girls who went missin last year, Shannon Alexander, 17 and Maisy Odjick, 16 of Kitigan Zibi, Quebec.  All three girls were taken on my 14 year-old daughter’s birthday, September 5.

Hilary, Shannon and Daisy are just three of hundreds of missing or murdered aboriginal women in Canada. Each loss is a personal tragedy. Together, they represent a national tragedy. Each of these women is somebody’s granddaughter, mother, auntie, niece or cousin. They are not only our Sisters in Spirit, they are our daughters too.

As of March 31, across Canada there are 520 missing or murdered aboriginal women. More than half remain unsolved. This number is not decreasing, it is getting higher and higher.

There are a number of factors contributing to the current situation.  The rates of teenage pregnancies and single mothers lead to vulnerability. Poverty and homelessness forces women to the streets. Prostitution among teenage and underage women is rampant. Chronic disease, addictions and mental illness are also key factors. Family violence and the inequalities of the Indian Act force some women away from living in First Nation communities. In many of these cases, First Nations women don’t have very many choices, little protection and must avail themselves to the dangers of the streets.

Canada’s most notorious serial killer, Robert (Willie) Pickton was linked to 27 murders of women from Vancouver’s downtown east side. More than half were First Nations women. He was convicted of six counts of second-degree murder. It remains to be seen if he faces the remaining 20 or so charges. But you’d better believe there are a few more Willie Picktons out there.

That doesn’t mean all these women are involved in drugs or prostitution either. In many of these cases, vulnerable women are simply stalked, lured and abducted.

In many cases, police are being criticized for their inaction and treating cases of missing aboriginal women different from other cases.

Today, a tearful Pamela Filler said she knew what had happened who was involved in the murder of her daughter. She said she told the police but they didn’t listen to her.

And this is not just happening to the down-and-out. This is happening to young, vibrant First Nations girls, like Hilary, Shannon and Maisy.

According to the Native Women’s Association of Canada, just over one half (52%) of the women and girls in the their database are youth under the age of 30 years. Of this group, 14% were 18 years of age or younger at the time of the incident. That’s 72 girls just like Hilary, Shannon and Maisy.

Something has to be done to protect our daughters.

A focused approach to prevention and protection of First Nations women is needed, not on a case-by-case basis, but with a comprehensive, nation-wide focus. Something has to be done in a big way.

I would suggest this begin by calling a Royal Commission to look into the circumstances of missing and murdered aboriginal women. A royal commission could compel evidence from families, communities, government and law enforcement agencies across

Canada to put all the pieces together and make serious recommendations for implementation.

Recommendations could include setting in place measurable reductions in violence against women, including roles for all aboriginal organizations, the federal government, provincial and municipal governments and First Nations. We need to see significant reduction in poverty and homelessness. Increased long-term and sustainable investments are also needed in the areas of education, health, child care programs and housing programs specifically for First Nations women. Urban shelters and safe houses for vulnerable women need to be built and funded.

We also need to see improvements in the justice system to protect First Nations women. This would include changes to the criminal code to increase sentences for violent offenders and new criminal provisions to protect vulnerable women; exploring the regulation of prostitution; improving enforcement and investigations and providing new tools to find missing women and prosecute violent offenders. Moreover, we need to develop an effective and wide-raging awareness and prevention campaign and development of protective programs such as a full-time national task force and street watch program.

We need to stop the infighting. “This is First Nations’ responsibility.” “This should be led by women.” “This is an off-reserve issue.” “No, this is an urban issue.” “This is a federal matter.” “This is a provincial and municipal matter.” In reality, this is an important issue for us all. We all need to accept responsibility and work together. No one needs to pass the buck or look out for number one.

Women need to feel safe. I don’t want to sound old-fashioned, but it’s the men’s responsibility to protect our women and our families. Our Anishinaabe teachings tell us this.

Sadly, even to this day, male privilege means the genders are not equal. There is no balance between the genders. I’m hopeful the day will come soon when male dominance is once and for all, humbled by the power, strength and beautiful Spirit of the women.

Until that day comes, we as men, need to stand up and do everything we can to Love, Respect and protect women. That means standing up on this issue, side by side with women, and calling for lasting change and justice for the 500 plus women that are calling out for help. This is a call to action.

We may not hear them but they are calling. Can you hear them?

November 13, 2009

Australia faces challenges in aboriginal ‘town camps’

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 5:29 pm

Aboriginal elders George Robertson (L), Toby Gara (C) and Brenda Maxwell (R) playing cards near their house in Hopy’s town camp at Alice Springs. (Anoek De Groot/AFP/Getty Images)

By Shar Adams
The Epoch Times

SYDNEY — The Australian Government is endeavouring to improve housing and conditions for people in the town camps of Alice Springs but critics of their approach say unless indigenous people are included in the development and implementation of the plan, the mistakes of past governments would only be repeated.

The Rudd Government has allocated $672 million dollars to improve housing in the Northern Territory, promising 750 new homes and 2500 refurbishments. Of that around $138 million has been allocated to the 18 town camps surrounding Alice Springs.

Ben Schokman, a human rights lawyer representing town camp residents opposed to the terms of the proposed 40-year-lease, says the government should be “commended” for its considerable investment, as town camps have been in a state of disrepair for years, with little spent from either the Northern Territory administration or local councils.

However it is the lack of indigenous involvement in the development and implementation that is of concern, he said.

“If you look at the history of successive government approaches here in Australia, let alone evidenced all round the world in terms of government practice towards indigenous people, if you don’t involve aboriginal people, indigenous people, in both the development of and implementation of those policies, then they are just not going to be successful,” he said.

Government expenditure is conditional on two key restrictions – that the government obtains secure land tenure through 40 year leases, and that it takes control of the way services are provided.

Mr. Schokman, who works at the Human Rights Law Resource Centre, said the current policy breaches the two most important concerns of indigenous people.

“The two rights which are most fundamental to aboriginal people are land rights and rights of self determination,” he told The Epoch Times. In undermining these two rights, the government’s approach is likely to affect the “the realisation of a whole range of other rights,” Mr. Schokman said, including “housing, education, health and political participation”.

Minister for Indigenous Affairs, Jenny Macklin, says she has been frustrated by delays in implementing the housing plan but her government is committed to “the transformation plan in Alice Springs.”

“Living conditions in the town camps are appalling and I will not give up on the residents,” she said in a statement.

Housing Authority Not Trusted

Greens Senator, Rachel Siewert, said she was concerned the government was going to hand over control of housing to the Northern Territory Housing Authority (NTHA), even though there were a number of proven alternatives.

“The sticking point is the government’s insistence that control of all housing in the town camps be handed over to the Northern Territory Housing Authority, which has a bad record on delivering public housing to Aboriginal people and which is simply not trusted by town camp residents,” she said in a statement.

Jenny Macklin conceded there were concerns, but is refusing to back down saying the NTHA is responsible for tenancy management in the region.

“We are working in partnership with the Northern Territory government but we have recognised the need to put Commonwealth officers on the ground to ensure we deliver,” she told the ABC.

Ben Schokman said the NTHA leasing agreements were not sensitive to indigenous culture, citing a number of examples.

One local was evicted from NTHA housing after returning from 13 days away on sorry business (a death in the family). It is a breach of the tenancy agreement to be away from their houses that long without giving authorities notice, he said.

Another local was evicted for having a fire outside in the yard, even though it is traditional to sit outside around the fire.

Another was threatened with eviction after her elderly mother came to stay. The mother, who lived 200 kilometers away had to travel to Alice Springs to use her basics card. Under a NTHA lease, it is forbidden to have anyone staying that is not on the lease, he said.

Mr. Schokman said such strict conditions would have a significant impact on Alice Springs town camps residents who have been used to self-management. In addition, providing housing which is culturally inappropriate ends up driving indigenous people back out, into the surrounds, which is how town camps began in the beginning, and which is starting to happen again as a result of evictions, he said.

Culturally Insensitive

Mr. Schokman said more effort could be made to be culturally sensitive around a whole range of issues including basic negotiation.

Negotiations are usually done the ‘white fella way’ a process most indigenous people find intimidating. “Even the language of negotiation is problematic,” he said.

Government officials say they are open to communication or comment and to just write an email, but most houses in the town camps do not even have running water, let alone electricity, he added.

Negotiating with indigenous communities could be slow, complex and frustrating but unless efforts were made to find a common ground of cooperation, the cycle would be repeated.

November 12, 2009

So long, Lou Dobbs

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 5:30 pm

I may be able to watch a little more of CNN now that Lou Dobbs is gone.

It was just on Tuesday that I was talking with my brother-in-law Robbie about Dobbs who was telling the story about the Fort Hood shootings. We know Dobbs detests terrorists. Even after the reporters were explaining over and over again that the suspect wasn’t linked to Islamic extremists, Dobbs pressed on. I guess if you’re Muslim and you kill a bunch of innocent people, you’re a terrorist. That’s not a far stretch. But is this about the suspect being a terrorists, or is it about him being Muslim?

Dobbs is well known for being the most outspoken critic of illegal immigrants and human rights they may or may not be entitled to in the United States. Anything will set him off. (Just trying saying “Taco anyone?” at the CNN lunch counter.) But is it because they are illegal aliens, or is it about them being Mexican? Sometimes it’s hard to tell.

There is a fine line here. When it sounds like racism and smells like racism? Is it racism? He’s pretty careful not to cross that line. But I wonder what Lou Dobbs sounds like at a barbeque, chasing two burgers with a six-pack?

I’ll give it to him, he’s honest. He’s not overwhelmed by political correctness. He has no fear. But I just can’t watch his show.

The Lou Dobbs Show isn’t news, It’s biased, personal commentary – pure and simple. Journalists are entitled to their opinion, sure. But his opinions far exceed anything that has been offered in television journalism. His opinions go beyond even Geraldo Rivera. Personally, I’d like to see them go toe-to-toe. Geraldo has taken down his share opinion-ists, namely a few neo-nazis skinheads in 1988.

Dobbs will be back. Probably for right-wing Fox News. But probably not for Al Jezeera or Telelatino.

For all of the brothers and sisters of colour, I’ll quote American History X: “You just take it easy on the brothers, a’ight? The brothers!”

Moose River Crossing

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 7:24 am

For Freddy Martin-Wapistan.

Some guy named Earl, I think
I knew him long ago
He sang of a place called
Moose River Crossing.

With his guitar he played a show
He was confident in who he was
Where he came from
And where he was going.

We departed early in the morning
I recall the cold mist off the water
On the regular train, north to Cochrane
And further north, beyond.

We sang some songs for curious tourists
The vinyl train seat being our drum
They said we were chanting
But I didn’t know anything about that
In school they said ‘Indians just did that’.

For them, it was a long wait in Cochrane
It wasn’t long enough for me
We get back on the train
with a pretty fun bunch of Crees.

I never thought I’d visit there
Moose River Crossing
If you blink, you might miss it
If you sleep, you’ll surely miss it.

I travel with hopes and dreams
Others will just return back home
Most have lived hard lives
Just like in the songs that Earl sings.

We arrive at Moose River Crossing.
Watche-ay! Lots of Watche-ay!
Greetings, welcome!
Brother, sister, cousin.

They all know each other
All are family. Kin-folk.
Like my Dad’s reruns of The Waltons
But with brown faces.

Displaced, swampy Crees
Living in the bush
This is the place they want to go
This is the place that they Love.

I can’t see why.
But I’m not from Moose River Crossing.
The train barely slows down
But for a few, it’s their whole world.

November 11, 2009

To God

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 9:09 pm

By John Trudell

We hope you don’t mind but we would like to talk to you. There are some things we need to straighten out, it’s about these Christians. They claim to be from your nation but man you should see the things they do all the time blaming it on you: manifest destiny, genocide, maximized profit, sterilization, raping the earth, lying, taking more than they need in all the forms of the greed. We ask them why. They say it’s God’s will.

Damn, God they make it so hard. Remember Jesus? Would you send him back to them, tell them not to kill him, rather they should listen. Stop abusing his name and yours.

We do not mean to be disrespectful, but you know how it is. Our people have their own ways. We never even heard of you until not long ago. Your representatives spoke magnificent things of you which we were willing to believe. But from the way they acted, we know we and you were being deceived.

We do not mean you and your Christian children any bad, but you all came to take all we had. We have not seen you but we have heard so much. It is time for you to decide what life is worth. We already remember but maybe you forgot.

Honouring Aboriginal veterans for their extraordinary service

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 5:29 pm

By The Hon. Brad Duguid
Minister of Aboriginal Affairs

This time last year, not long after I became Minister of Aboriginal Affairs, I was meeting with Serpent River First Nation. I was honoured to have been invited by their Chief to attend their community’s Remembrance Day ceremonies in Elliot Lake.

In the year since, I’ve learned a great deal about the contributions that Aboriginal people have made to Canadian society.

First Nation, Métis and Inuit people aided the early settlers, provided our ancestors with lifesaving and necessary food and medicine, and were key to forming the early economy through the fur trade.

But one of the most significant contributions has been their extraordinary military service that goes as far back as the War of 1812 and before.

I’ve been reminded of this sacrifice each time I’ve attended a Pow-Wow. I’m always moved by the respect and recognition that is paid to First Nations veterans. Their recognition isn’t limited to one day a year.

To commemorate the contributions of Métis veterans, a monument has been erected on Juno Beach in France. The monument will be dedicated on Remembrance Day this year.

I’ve learned in the past year that Aboriginal military service was inspired, in large part, by the friendship treaties and by loyalty to the Crown. And so when Canada entered into global conflicts during the first and second World Wars and in Korea, Aboriginal people volunteered en masse to support Canadian’s shared principles.

During this time, Six Nations of the Grand River provided more soldiers to the Canadian Armed Forces than any other First Nation. In one eastern Ontario First Nation, the Algonquins of Pikwakanagan, nearly every single able-bodied man volunteered to serve in the armed forces. The key word is volunteered. Aboriginal people were exempt from conscription and not required to serve.

That they volunteered in such numbers is all the more notable because they knew what they were giving up upon returning home. Through a process called enfranchisement, they would immediately lose their Indian Status when they joined the armed forces. Then, upon completion of their service, Aboriginal veterans would not be eligible for military pensions, subsidies, and land grants provided to their non-Aboriginal comrades. They would not even be eligible to vote until 1960. Thankfully, enfranchisement is a thing of the past.

But many veterans of 20th century conflicts lived their remaining days in outright poverty. Canada’s most decorated Aboriginal soldier, Sgt. Tommy Prince, was forced to sell his medals to support himself. He died penniless in Winnipeg in 1977.

Aboriginal veterans deserved better.

On November 11 at 11 a.m., we should take time to honour Canadian veterans of all backgrounds. Many will reflect on the service of their family members. Others will be thankful for those long passed. At that time, I will be sure to remember and honour those many brave Aboriginal veterans who paid many sacrifices in service, in life and in death.

You will not be forgotten.

November 9, 2009

Luc can’t believe his luck

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 5:14 pm

Robitaille’s Hall of Fame career had humble beginning

By Wayne Scanlan, The Ottawa Citizen

He goes by the handle of “Lucky Luc” and it isn’t hard to see why. Luc Robitaille continues to be blessed by things he couldn’t see coming.

Robitaille, 43, former Hull Olympique of the QMJHL, is being inducted into the Hockey Hall of Fame today along with fellow players Steve Yzerman, Brian Leetch, Brett Hull and builder Lou Lamoriello.

Even now, Luc can hardly believe his luck.

“You are just a kid, you want to play a game,” says the Montreal native, “and the next thing you know, you’re in the Hall of Fame with all the legends.”

Robitaille suited up with a few of them on Sunday afternoon, taking part in the Hall of Fame Legends game at the Air Canada Centre.

Not many Hall of Famers had a more humble entry into the NHL. Despite a tremendous junior career in Hull (85 points as a rookie in his draft year, and 191 points in his final year in the ‘Q’), Robitaille was considered a poor skater. Scouts dismissed his numbers as just more bloated stats from Quebec.

One hundred and seventy kids were drafted ahead of him in 1984 — and that included baseball pitcher Tom Glavine, who was selected by the L.A. Kings in the fourth round, 69th overall.

Robitaille only knew one scout, Alex Smart of Ottawa, working for the Kings. Smart would cross the bridge to see Robitaille play with the Olympiques.

“So, every time the Kings turn came up I thought it was my only shot to get in the NHL, because I’d never heard from any other scout,” Robitaille says.

The wait was agonizing.

Robitaille and several of his Olympiques teammates were at the Montreal Forum shortly past noon, hoping and wondering. This was the year Mario Lemieux had been drafted first overall by the Pittsburgh Penguins, but refused to put on the uniform because he hadn’t come to a contract agreement. The confusion around the Lemieux situation added nearly another hour’s wait.

Over the next several hours, Robitaille consumed six or seven hot dogs, give or take.

“I think I had about a hot dog a round, or a hot dog an hour … those great hot dogs at the Montreal Forum.”

Robitaille figures it was 7 p.m. by the time his name was called, in the ninth round in a near empty arena. Beaming, he ran downstairs to the floor to meet Kings officials and was promptly stopped by a security guard.

Where do you think you’re going? Robitaille had no agent. Luckily (what else?), Pierre Lacroix, a player agent at the time, saw Robitaille being held up and smoothed the way past security. Robitaille proudly marched up to the Kings table, which by that time was populated by just two staffers, one of them the director of player personnel.

“Who are you?” he says to Luc.

“I’m Luc Robitaille — you just drafted me.”

The player personnel guy looks at his list, sees Robitaille’s name and says, “Oh, you’re right, but we don’t have any more jerseys or caps.”

So the staffer pulls a Kings pin off the lapel of his own jacket and flips it to Robitaille: “Here.”

“That was my souvenir,” Robitaille says. “I’ve still got the pin, too.” A hotshot draft pick today would view the abrupt welcome as a slight. Not Robitaille. A foot in the door was enough.

“I was so pumped,” he says. “My name was on the list, so I knew I had a shot now.”

In Los Angeles, the legendary Marcel Dionne took Robitaille under his wing. Right from the first training camp, Dionne dismissed Robitaille’s crazy notion that HE might feed Dionne. “It’s funny, because my idol was Wayne, I took so much pride in being a playmaker,” Robitaille says.

Although he had 123 assists in his final year in Hull, setting up Guy Rouleau, being the next Gretzky wasn’t Robitaille’s calling.

Garry Galley, a former Robitaille teammate in L.A., remembers Robitaille being chided as “Cy Young” for his lopsided goals to assist ratio (eg. 24-3 midway through a season. Get it? Cy Young kind of numbers). One time, Robitaille vowed to set someone up on his next shift, dutifully throwing a pass out front, only to have it bounce in off a defenceman. Goal — Robitaille. He skated by his own bench and said, “I tried.”

In that first camp, Robitaille tried to set up Dionne on a 2-on-1, when the great centre set him straight.

“He comes to the bench,” Robitaille recalls, “and he says, ‘listen kid, I’ll be the playmaker, you go to the net and I’ll feed you.’ “I said, ‘alright Mr. Dionne.’ “I’m no dummie. It’s kind of funny, he kept feeding me and I kept scoring.”

No kidding. In his first seven seasons, Robitaille recorded 45, 53, 46, 52, 45, 44 and 63 goals for the Kings. His biggest thrill? His first game, against the St. Louis Blues in the fall of 1986.

“I went from no one,” Robitaille says. “No one thought I’d make it. I’ll never forget getting on the ice my first game, being on the bench as anxious as ever and I think we went as a fourth line on that first shift.

“I jumped on the ice, go right to the front of the net and Rick Wamsley made a mistake, whipped it around the boards and Marcel Dionne stops it. I go, ‘Marcel!’ and he gave it to me and I tipped it in the empty net.”

Dionne loved the fact Robitaille was in L.A. to play hockey and the kid wound up with 668 goals — 668 more than Tom Glavine — and 1,394 points, plus a Stanley Cup season in 2002, alongside fellow inductees Yzerman and Hull.

Lucky guy, Luc Robitaille.

Older Posts »

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the Anishinawbe Blog is solely the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect, in any manner, the opinions and position of his employer, community, family or associates.

NOTICE: The Anishinawbe Blog is copyright (c) 2009 BobGoulais.com, Nipissing First Nation, Ontario Canada. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, distribution, electronic transmission or unauthorized use, without the expressed permission of the author, is strictly prohibited.

Powered by WordPress