Anishinawbe Blog

September 29, 2007

The Psychology of Warfare vs. Pacifism

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 1:47 pm

By Bob Goulais

It’s time that we offer constructive criticism to our brothers and sisters in Six Nations over the increasingly violent incidents happening in Caledonia.

First things first, an important message of understanding to the Haudenasaunsee Confederacy: we fully understand the root of your frustration as well as the historical facts regarding your claim in Caledonia. This is without question. This is Mohawk land. It was taken illegally. The Douglas Estates development was proceeding on this disputed parcel of land. The government is in the wrong.

But I truly feel the psychology of warfare has overtaken good negotiation strategy, good will and is now bordering on real terrorism. This is most definitely hurting the Haudenasaunee cause in Caledonia.

The history of the Haudenasaunee (known by the French as “Iroquois”) is rampant with violence. The history of the Six Nations speaks of generations of warfare among their own Nations: Mohawk, Seneca, Oneida, Onondaga, Cuyuga and the Tuscarora. Their most sacred precept, the Great Peace, was their means of ending centuries of civil war and where they literally buried their weapons under the Great Tree of Peace. This the where the term “bury the hatchet” comes from.

However, the warfare didn’t end there. History tells us how the Haudenasaunee Confederacy came together in a great military alliance and waged war, not in defence of lands, but to pillage their neighbouring Nations of their territory and food supply leading to disasterous campaigns for the Wendat and the Nbisiing.

Right up into the 1800’s, the Haudenasaunee War Chiefs were never given much rest, unlike the Anishinabek-Three Fires Confederacy where the War Chiefs were called upon only during times of warfare.

Even their assimilation into Canadian society was done under threat of violence. (And here’s where the provincial Progressive Conservative promise of “One Law for All” gets a little ironic.) The Six Nations have never subjected themselves to Canadian law. They were forced by gunpoint to discontinue their traditional governance and accept the authority of the Indian Act.

Even during peacetime, the Mohawk warrior society will always be active, always ready, always honing their skills – but also finding outlets for their psychology of warfare.

Over the past few decades, the Mohawk warrior society has mobilized and supported demonstrations and occupations across Canada in places like Oka, Gustafson Lake, Ipperwash, Burnt Church, and most recently in Calendonia and Tyendinga.

In my opinion, this psychology of warfare is now becoming a disservice for the Haudenasaunee Confederacy.

Arguably, humanity has changed. Western society now looks favourably on non-violent movements such as what has taken place in Burma-Myanmar this week. The most effective movement leaders have been non-violent leaders: Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther-King and Nelson Mandella. Westerners look down at strong-arm government tactics to crush such grass-roots movements. While guerilla movements and terrorism continue to leave a bad taste in the mouths of westerners.

It’s definitely time for the Mohawk Warrior Society to “stand-down”.

There is certainly a time and place for our warrior societies. They are definitely needed to protect their families, communities and Nation during legitimate threat of war and violence against our people. As a warrior myself, I always thought that there would be a time where our Ogitchidaa must rise up to protect our Nation from unilateral government violence. During that time, I would be proud to fight shoulder-to-shoulder with the Mohawk Warriors in a “just” war.

But to use violence as a means punish and hurt individuals is cowardly. To use the threat of violence and intimidation to influence negotiation is dishonourable.

I am not entirely convinced that the Clan Mothers and Leadership of the Haudenasaunee Confederacy are in control of the actions and tactics of the Mohawk warrior society. If they were, would they take responsibilities over the assault on the developer at a neighbouring site in Caledonia?

I don’t think they have to, because I know that Chief Allen McNaughton and the Clan Mothers are honourable people and would never hurt anyone for the sake of hurting someone. They may leading the negotiations, but they don’t have true control over these spineless terrorists who pose as legitimate Mohawk “warriors” and beat up on defenseless people.

Same with so-called “warrior” Shawn Brant. In Tyendinaga, the Confederacy have no control over their local warrior man and his merry band of houligans. Only one man is calling the shots in Tyendinaga and that man is Shawn Brant.

Reported incidents of alcohol and drug use, alleged sexual assaults, at the Caledonia occupation site are certainly not reflective of the Haudenausaunee. Neither is the brutal assault on Mr. Gualtieri.

As an indigenous man and a member of the Ogitchidaa Society – I am ashamed of the conduct of these so-called “warriors”. I offer my congratulations to Allen McNaughton who publically apologized to Mr. Gualtieri following the incident.

None of these developments will lead to the needed support from grass-roots Canadians. They will only lead to further frustration, racism, ignorance and ambivilence from Canadians.

The Haudenasaunsee Confederacy leadership needs to take steps to address these issues. Further, the Warrior Society itself needs to clean up it’s act. They need to publicly punish those who dishonour their people and their noble cause. The most difficult job for the Haudenasaunee is to obtain the support of Canadians – beginning with the residents of Caledonia.

The best way to realize our collective goals as indigenous people is to gain the support and friendship of Canadians and all citizens of Mother Earth. Our Nations need to plan and embrace pacifism and non-violent action. This must be done on a large scale and has to be done collectively. I feel this is the future of our “Era of Action”.

Just think about the possibilities… If we could arrange to have 250,000 of our people march on Parliament Hill – we would turn a lot of heads to our cause. If half of those people were to stay, set-up camp and occupy Parliament Hill – it would turn a lot more heads. However, if these events were to become violent due to our impatience and lack of discipline, we would lose much needed support of Canadians and the world. Under the present circumstances, we would have to think long and hard about inviting the Mohawk Warrior Society to Parliament Hill.

September 27, 2007

Anishinabek launch First Peoples Vote initiative

Filed under: Anishinabek — Bob Goulais @ 2:45 pm

http://www.FirstPeoplesVOTE.com

NIPISSING FIRST NATION (September 28, 2007) – Anishinabek Nation leader John Beaucage says the time is past when First Peoples can be taken for granted by mainstream political processes.

“It is important for our people to vote,” the Grand Council Chief said, in announcing the  creation of the First Peoples Vote initiative to encourage Anishinabek citizens to play active roles in the Oct. 10 Ontario election. “We must not be taken for granted by mainstream political parties, nor must we be dismissed as being unimportant because we don’t vote.”

Beaucage said the Union of Ontario Indians – the 42-member Anishinabek Nation’s corporate arm – has developed the firstpeoplesvote.com website as a non-partisan initiative to:

  • Encourage the participation of all First Peoples (First Nation, Métis and Inuit) in general elections;

  • Provide information to voters on issues that are important to First Peoples’ citizens, organizations, and governments;

  • Share information from mainstream political parties; and

  • Create an online discussion forum for the exchange of opinions and ideas.

“Candidates and elected representatives often check polling results to see where they received the most votes,” noted the Grand Council Chief. “This can often influence how they focus their efforts after they are elected.  First Peoples can use our collective voting strength to prove to politicians the importance of their parties supporting our issues.

“Let’s demonstrate that we can make a difference.”

Beaucage identified elements of the Anishinabek “Era of Action” campaign as key issues requiring urgent action by whichever party forms the government following the Oct. 10 provincial election. These include the implementation of recommendations from the Ipperwash Inquiry Report that call for prompt and equitable resolution of land claims through the establishment of an independent Treaty Commission of Ontario, and the province working with First Nations to establish co-management and resource-sharing initiatives.

The Anishinabek Nation incorporated the Union of Ontario Indians as its secretariat in 1949.  The UOI is a political advocate for 42 member First Nations across Ontario.  The Union of Ontario Indians is the oldest political organization in Ontario and can trace its roots back to the Confederacy of Three Fires, which existed long before European contact.

- 30 -

For more information contact: 

Bob Goulais
Executive Assistant to the Grand Council Chief

Anishinabek Nation – Union of Ontario Indians
Head Office:  Nipissing First Nation
P.O. Box 711, North Bay, ON  P1B 8J8
Ph. (705) 497-9127   Fx. (705) 497-9135  CELL:  (705) 498-5250
E-mail:  goubob@anishinabek.ca
Internet:  http://www.anishinabek.ca/uoi

Evo Morales on The Daily Show

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bob Goulais @ 1:45 pm

Here are a few exchanges and quotes from Jon Stewart’s interview on The Daily Show.

Jon Stewart:  “Your story is remarkable. How does a farmer, a poor farmer with a high school education become the first indigenous president of Bolivia? It’s an amazing journey.”

President Evo Morales:  “We all have rights, as I understand it.  Its not just professionals and intellectuals that can become President.  People who have other experiences and who work can become President.  Therefore, indigenous people can become President.”

Stewart:  “In Bolivia.”  (audience laughs).  “In the U.S. it’s a little rigged.”

Morales:  “Well, in America – if its rigged then you have to fix it.”  (laughter and applause)

“We are going for with a multi-cultural, multi-national state, trying to live in unity and respect our diversity.  We’re so diverse.  There are black – green and blue eyed people like you.”

Stewart: “Thanks for noticing”. (laughter)

Morales:  “We need to all come together so we are united.  I know we are dfferent within our nation, and among nations.  Those differences  must be respected.”

“We need to celebrate thoese differences, coming together so we can support life among all human kind.”

“We all need to come together to save lives.  To save human kind.”

“I hear many leaders talking about global warm, talking about climate change.  But they don’t say why or where it’s coming from.  Perhaps it’s from western culture, perhaps it’s becauseof excessive luxury, excessive consumption.  If we are think human kind we have to think of saving lives.”

Morales: (concludes):  “Please don’t consider me to be a part of th axis of evil.” (laughter)

Bolivian President Appears on Daily Show

Filed under: Uncategorized — Bob Goulais @ 1:41 pm

NEW YORK (AP) — It took him a while to loosen up, but Bolivian President Evo Morales got the last laugh on “The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.”

Morales strode up to the stage Tuesday to whooping and applause — and one shout of “Evoooo!” — from the audience at Comedy Central’s Emmy award-winning fake news program.

Looking a bit stiff and speaking through a translator, Morales did not seem at first to understand some of Stewart’s jokes, delivering serious responses. But he gradually relaxed under gentle questioning from Stewart and a crowd that delighted in the leftist leader’s indictments of Western capitalism and appeals for social justice.

Morales, a fierce nationalist, has at times had tense relations with Washington. His appearance on the late-night show, known for its liberal leanings, was a highlight of his visit to New York for the U.N. General Assembly meeting.

“Your story is remarkable. How does a farmer, a poor farmer with a high school education become the first indigenous president of Bolivia? It’s an amazing journey,” Stewart asked.

“We all have rights, as I understand it,” said Morales, an Aymara Indian who has moved to nationalize Bolivia’s oil and gas industry and is seeking a new constitution that would grant more power to his Andean nation’s indigenous majority.

“Professionals and intellectuals are not the only ones who can be presidents,” he said. “Indigenous people can also be president.”

“In Bolivia,” Stewart deadpanned, leaning forward conspiratorially. “In America, it’s a little rigged.”

Morales has reveled in several public appearances during his New York trip. He is the second head of state to appear on “The Daily Show,” according to the network. Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf appeared in September 2006.

Morales, who rose to prominence as the leader of coca growers, often rails against U.S. global dominance, much like his close allies Hugo Chavez of Venezuela and Cuban leader Fidel Castro.

On Monday, however, he found a friendly audience at New York’s Cooper Union institution, where he declared capitalism “the worst enemy of humanity,” drawing cheers from about 200 students, some waving small Bolivian flags. On Wednesday, he will address the U.N. General Assembly, where last year he dramatically brandished a coca leaf.

Back home, Morales has faced political turmoil. Violent protests have prompted an assembly rewriting Bolivia’s constitution to call a monthlong recess in hopes of rescuing the stalled process.

But when Stewart urged Morales to discuss his reforms, the president got free reign to extol his successes and drew wild applause with nearly every example. He finished with a flourish.

“Please don’t consider me part of the axis of evil,” Morales said to a roar of laughter from his host and audience.

Bolivia’s president proposes convening UN world indigenous forum

Filed under: Anishinabek — Bob Goulais @ 1:39 pm

26 September 2007 – UN NEWS — The President of Bolivia today called for the United Nations to convene a world indigenous forum to foster a new approach to economic relations based on an appreciation of natural resources and not their exploitation.

Addressing the General Assembly’s annual high-level debate, Evo Morales welcomed the recent approval of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, thanking all countries, except the four which voted against it.

“Our culture is a culture of life,” said the President, the first indigenous leader of Bolivia.

He called on the UN to convene a world indigenous forum to “understand different ways of life.”

Questioning whether it was necessary to exploit and plunder in order to live well, he suggested instead that living well is living within a community – not having an excess of material wealth.

To indigenous communities, he said, the Earth is sacred, as demonstrated by their practices. “Let us gather these experiences to defend life and to save humankind,” he said.

President Morales said natural resources should be used to benefit nations, he said, adding that while companies have a right to profit, they do not have a right to plunder.

Natural resources should be accessible to all, he argued. “Water is a human right. Energy is a human right,” he said, stressing that these should not be considered commodities to be exploited by private businesses.

He said talk of biofuels was confusing. “I don’t understand how we can produce food for cars. Soil should be for life! Because there is a lack of gas we are going to divert food for automobiles?” He called for giving up luxury. “We cannot continue to accumulate garbage,” he said.

President Morales spoke out against “economic policies that have caused genocide” and denounced the arms race. “War is the industry of death,” he declared.

He decried the economic imbalance of the world, where wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few. “Collective globalization that does not respect plurality or differences is the source of the problem,” he said.

The President also spoke of his own difficulties traveling to the UN Assembly. “I don’t know how all of you managed to come here to the United States but at least my delegation had a great deal of visa problems,” he said, proposing that “perhaps we should change the site of the United Nations.”

September 20, 2007

Something from Bob…

Filed under: Personal — Bob Goulais @ 3:58 pm

I know everytime I write something from my heart, it starts out with the inevitiable “it’s been very b*sy.  Today, I’m censoring myself and won’t be talking about w*rk or how b*sy I am.

I’ve come to the realization that my life is about the dreaded ‘W’ word.  No, that’s not ‘welfare’.  (If that’s what you thought the “W’ word was – you must be a redskin.)  And no it’s not ‘women’.  (If that’s what you thought – I’m offended. *wink*). .. No, my life for the past few years has been about ‘w*rk’.  I’m w*rking far to long and hard.  Sometimes going without adequate rest, good food, sometimes no food whatsoever.  On a recent drive from Curve Lake I was given a straightening out!!

Why do I do that?  I don’t consider myself a workaholic – although that’s really what I am.  I’ve given up much in life to do what I’m doing and I am grateful and would never second guess my professional decisions.  I have absolutely no regrets.

April asked that I consider family.  I replied that “I am doing all this w*rk for my family, for my community and for the Spirit.”

It was then that it hit me.  That was my excuse for being a workaholic.

The work we do for our families and for the Spirit should not take away from our immediate needs and the immediate needs of our Loved ones.  Being Ogitchidaa means I put their lives first – and I haven’t been doing that. 

As a result, my health has suffered and I’ve seen my family less now than ever.  I sleep in more hotels, travel through more airports, eat more take out, put in 12 hour days.  Until Monday, I hadn’t had a real home cooked meal in three weeks.  (Miigwetch Momma).  Following that great meal I went a full 24 hours without any food before I was forced to grab a bag of Frito Lays and a real Coca-Cola.  On that same day, I was in the office for a full 11 hours.

I had to ask myself “what am I doing?”.

I’m going to be taking some time for myself, and spending more time with my partner and my children.  That doesn’t mean I’ll be w*rking any less, it means I will better manage my responsibilites both professional and personal, take better care of my health, eat better, rest more often.  In that way, I will be more able to fufill my roles as provider and Ogitchidaa for family, my community and my Nation.

I Love you all. 

September 14, 2007

Canada misses chance to be world leader in indigenous rights

Filed under: Anishinabek — Bob Goulais @ 11:36 am

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Canada misses chance to be world leader in indigenous rights

NIPISSING FIRST NATION (Sept. 14, 2007) – Canada has passed up a golden
opportunity to be seen as a global leader in the advancement of
indigenous rights, says John Beaucage, Grand Council Chief of the Anishinabek Nation.

“As delighted as we are to see the world community recognize the
fundamental rights of First Peoples, I think that many Canadians will be ashamed that their government has made this country one of only four nations in the world to vote against the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples,” said Beaucage.

“For three decades, First Nations leaders and delegates have collaborated with Canadian
governments of various political stripes to provide input into the
document approved Thursday. The vote is a stain on Canada’s
international reputation as a leading advocate for the advancement of human rights, especially since Canada is a current member of the U.N. Human Rights Council.”

Of 147 countries casting ballots, at the U.N. General Assembly in New York, only Canada, the United States, Australia and New Zealand opposed the declaration – a non-binding, largely symbolic statement that recognizes the histories, traditions, cultures, languages, and spirituality of indigenous peoples. A total of 11 countries abstained.

Speaking on behalf of the 42 member communities of the Anishinabek Nation in Ontario, the Grand Council Chief endorsed a joint statement issued by indigenous representatives of the North American region, that said in part:

———————————–

“We, Indigenous Peoples of this land, are part of Creation, in
the homelands we inherited from our ancestors. We understand from our original teachings that we are meant to live in harmony with all
Creation and with other Peoples, including with those who came to our homelands seeking a better life for themselves and their children. Our Nations entered into sacred treaties with them. Sadly, these treaties have been violated time and time again. The tragic and brutal story of what happened to us, especially at the hands of the governments, is well known.

“Today at the United Nations, states have finally recognized what we have always known – we are Peoples, equal in all ways to all other Peoples, with inherent and inalienable rights to our survival, our way of life, lands and self-determination.”

———————————–

The Anishinabek Nation incorporated the Union of Ontario Indians as its secretariat in 1949. The UOI is a political advocate for 42 member First Nations across Ontario. The Union of Ontario Indians is the oldest political organization in Ontario and can trace its roots back to the Confederacy of Three Fires, which existed long before European
contact.

- 30 -

For more information:

Bob Goulais, Executive Assistant to the Grand Council Chief
Phone: (705) 497-9127 (Ext. 2249)
or cell: (705) 498-5250,
Email: goubob@anishinabek.ca

September 13, 2007

U.N. Declaration Adopted. Canada Votes Against It

Filed under: Anishinabek — Bob Goulais @ 1:58 pm

The results of today’s vote at the United Nations:

Yes 143
No 4
Abstain 11

Canada voted AGAINST the declaration as did the United States, Australia and New Zealand.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SEPTEMBER 13TH, 2007
UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK

U.N. DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES FINALLY ADOPTED AFTER 25 YEARS!

Indigenous Representatives from the North American Region share the following statement with the world community:

United Nations, New York – We bring you respectful greetings from our Leaders, Elders, men, women and children of all the Indigenous Peoples of North America.

It is a great day when Indigenous Peoples can be counted among all the other Peoples on Mother Earth. Today at the United Nations, States have finally recognized what we have always known – We are Peoples, equal in all ways to all other Peoples, with inherent and inalienable rights to our survival, our way of life, lands and self-determination.

We, Indigenous Peoples of this land, are part of Creation, in the homelands we inherited from our ancestors. We understand from our original teachings that we are meant to live in harmony with all Creation and with other Peoples, including with those who came to our homelands seeking a better life for themselves and their children. Our Nations entered into sacred Treaties with them. Sadly, these treaties have been violated time and time again. The tragic and brutal story of what happened to us, especially at the hands of the governments, is well known.

But today, with the adoption of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by the United Nations General Assembly, we see the opportunity for a new beginning, for another kind of relationship with States in North America and indeed throughout the world.

We celebrate that the fundamental human rights which we have all worked so hard to uphold in this Declaration are still intact in the final text now adopted by the UN General Assembly. These include inherent rights related to our traditional lands, territories and natural resources, our self-determination, our unqualified recognition as Peoples, our own cultures, languages and identities, our subsistence, our own concepts of developments, Treaties, and free, prior and informed consent.

We recognize with gratitude everyone who contributed to this 25 years effort, who dedicated themselves over many long years to bring us to this day. Many of those from our own Indigenous Nations of North America who were central to the development of this Declaration, are no longer with us in this world. We honor and recognize those great ones in particular today.

Many Indigenous Peoples, including those who supported the modified Declaration, expressed profound concerns with the process that created final changes to the text, for example, those related to a lower standard applicable to military activities. This process was completed without the direct participation of Indigenous Peoples.

We once again express our appreciation for the UN Human Rights Council which took the historic and courageous step to adopt the Declaration in its first session in June 2006. Indigenous Peoples will never forget this action by the Human Rights Council. We look forward to immediately undertaking the implementation of the rights affirmed in the Declaration, hand in hand with states and UN bodies, in particular the UN Human Rights Council. We count on strong state and UN support in this regard.

We express our profound appreciation to the many states which voted in support of the Declaration today. We take note and call the attention of the world to those who have opposed it. We call on them to re-consider their position in the near future and take the Declaration to heart.

In closing, we affirm that this is an historic day for Indigenous Peoples in the international community, and indeed for humanity as a whole. We hope, and dedicate ourselves to working for our vision that it will be carried out by Indigenous Peoples and states in good faith, with good will and with integrity, so that Indigenous communities and Peoples of North America and around the world will be able to experience real benefits. The survival, dignity and well-being of Indigenous Peoples requires nothing less. We remain committed to lifting the spirits of our peoples according to the teachings of our ancestors for the benefit of all members of our communities and for the future generations.

All our relations.

UN vote needs Canada’s support

Filed under: Anishinabek — Bob Goulais @ 8:30 am

The Toronto Star
Thursday September 13, 2007
By Barbara Hall

Member countries of the United Nations will vote today at a meeting of the General Assembly on whether to adopt the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The declaration is the culmination of more than 20 years of international consultation in which Canada has played a significant role, negotiating common ground between indigenous peoples and participating countries, and helping to draft many key articles.

The declaration sets out much-needed international standards to protect the rights of indigenous peoples, who in many parts of the world lack even the minimal protections afforded to Canada’s First Nations, Inuit and Metis peoples.

I was, therefore, deeply disappointed when Canada led a failed vote against the declaration at the Human Rights Council last year and recently made public its continued opposition to the declaration.

This past month I wrote the Prime Minister of Canada to urge the government to reconsider its position and vote in support of the declaration.

Indigenous peoples are among the most marginalized and dispossessed in the world. They endure prejudice, discrimination and violations of human rights that threaten their cultural survival.

Indigenous groups, especially in developing countries, report abuse, land losses, disappearances and worse by governments that refuse to recognize their status or title.

As UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon recently said, discrimination affects more than 370 million indigenous people around the world with disproportionate rates of extreme poverty.

I am sure I don’t need to remind readers of the significant frustrations facing aboriginal peoples in Canada. Many endure higher levels of poverty, worse living conditions and far less control over their lives and lands than do non-aboriginal Canadians.

The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is urgently needed to bring attention to these serious human rights concerns and to galvanize efforts to address them around the world.

The Canadian government has expressed concern that the declaration would impact on national efforts to balance aboriginal land claims and self- governance with competing national interests.

However, these concerns are not valid. The declaration is not a document that creates new rights but one that would actually help clarify Canada’s existing obligations under domestic and international law. It is non-binding and is specifically required to be interpreted in light of existing laws, standards and the rights of non-aboriginal populations.

An independent poll commissioned by Amnesty International (Canada) shows that the majority of Canadians support the declaration and feel Canada needs to take a leadership role in this area of human rights.

By supporting the UN declaration, Canada would be affirming its commitment to the rights of indigenous peoples who are increasingly alienated by the inaction of governments in this country, and would further their relationship with those governments.

The commission urges the government of Canada to withdraw its opposition and vote in favour of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples at the UN General Assembly today. To do otherwise would seriously weaken the leadership position this country has long enjoyed in the global human rights movement.

(See our letter to the Prime Minister on the Ontario Human Rights Commission website, www.ohrc.on.ca)

———————————–

Barbara Hall is chief commissioner of the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

September 6, 2007

Response to Op-Ed piece in Kingston Whig-Standard

Filed under: Anishinabek — Bob Goulais @ 1:34 pm

Sorry, Whig.

The Indian-as-uncivilized savage metaphors just don¹t cut it any more.  Laws are also the foundation of indigenous societies.

Check Britannica and you might be surprised to learn that the framers of the U.S. Constitution borrowed their division of federal and state powers from the Haudenosaunee, who had incorporated the concept in their Great Law almost 1,000 years ago.

Anishinabek peoples had societal codes forbidding family inter-marriage when the crowned heads of Europe were as inbred as poodles.

The Mayans were probing such natural laws as the movement of the stars when Catholics were burning scholars at the stake for suggesting that the earth revolved around the sun.

Midewiwin taught the one-Creator gospel at a time when the Greeks and Romans were groveling before idols of humans depicted with wings, horns, and multiple bosoms.

No, your attempt to dismiss us as recalcitrant trouble-makers flouting the “rule of law” just doesn¹t cut it.

You betray your ignorance of the concept of aboriginal rights by comparing the Algonquins¹ struggle to keep uranium-mining squatters off their traditional territory to a spat between divorced spouses.

First Nations citizens have never been “married” to Canadians; the Royal Proclamation of 1763 respected us as distinct ³nations², a concept regularly upheld by Canada¹s courts and constitution.

But if you insist on sticking with your absurd attempt to over-simplify this complex topic, at least do it right.

Consider that you are the spouse of a husband determined to deprive you of any share of the fruits of your marriage.

He hires the most expensive lawyers money can buy, who wins possession of your house, and gets the judge to issue a court order that  results in a bailiff tossing you out onto the street with no money to buy your children food, health care, or schooling. (You also learn that he has infected you with a life-threatening venereal disease.)

Then you learn that he has sold your marital home and property for two million dollars to a land developer who has been coveting the site for years. In divorce court, another judge says you and your children are not entitled to any of the proceeds.

And, oh yes — your legal outcome is similar to that experienced by all women in your family since 1867.

Your options:  go “ho-hum ­ guess I¹ll respect the rule of law” or take whatever action you feel necessary to protect you and your children.

In the landmark report of the Ipperwash Inquiry into the death of unarmed Native protester Dudley George, Justice Sidney Linden pleaded for Canadian and Ontario governments to end “centuries of discrimination and dispossession.”

For this to happen, institutions like the Kingston Whig-Standard need to have a much greater understanding of Native issues than they apparently do now.

Maurice Switzer
Director of Communications
Union of Ontario Indians

Older Posts »

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in the Anishinawbe Blog is solely the personal opinion of the author and does not reflect, in any manner, the opinions and position of his employer, community, family or associates.

NOTICE: The Anishinawbe Blog is copyright (c) 2009 BobGoulais.com, Nipissing First Nation, Ontario Canada. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, distribution, electronic transmission or unauthorized use, without the expressed permission of the author, is strictly prohibited.

Powered by WordPress